The matter-energy entering our level of the universe first appears as "Dark
Energy" which evolves into "Dark Matter" which continues to condense
together and form planets, stars galaxies, i.e. visible matter and energy.
Multi-Level Cosmology
In 1984 Mark Hucko proposed an alternate cosmological theory, the so-called Multi-Level
Universe theory. This theory takes into account the expansion of our level of the
universe, which many believe to be the only one, as well as the beginning of our level of
the universe, usually referred to as the big bang.
According to the Multi-Level Universe theory, higher (outer) levels of the universe keep
falling into lower (inner) levels and so on at infinitum. According to Hucko the matter
that keeps falling into a black hole appears to be falling into (disappearing into) an
infinitely small and dense place - however, viewed from the inside of the black-hole,
there is another perspective.
From the viewpoint of an observer inside the black hole, the point of creation of the
black hole (the creation of singularity and of the event horizon) appears as a big bang,
as the beginning of his level of the universe. And all the matter falling into his (inner)
level, from the higher (outer) level, expands his universe. And as long as more matter
keeps on falling into his (inner)level of the universe from a higher (outer) level of the
universe, his level keeps on expanding. As his level gets bigger, it starts losing matter
into black holes within, i.e. into other even lower levels of the universe. At a point
when the amount of matter falling into his level from a higher level equals to the amount
of matter which his level loses to lower levels, his level of the universe stops
expanding. When the amount of matter lost to lower levels (through falling into black
holes within) exceeds the amount of matter falling in from the higher (outer) level, his
level of the universe starts collapsing.
According to Mark Hucko, space, matter, energy and time, SMET for short, cannot exist one
without the other. They are in fact different aspects of the same thing: SMET. So the more
matter falls into a black hole, with that matter falling into that black hole, falls
inside also the appropriate amount of energy, space and time. This means that the more
matter falls in (accompanied by space) from the viewpoint of the internal observer, his
level of the universe keeps getting bigger. While for us black holes appear to be
infinitely dense for an internal observer they appear infinitely large and empty, just an
empty expanding space.
Why Multi-Level Universe?
The main problem with Big-Bang, Steady-State and similar one-level cosmological models is
that they fail to explain such phenomena as the expansion of the universe, the beginning
and the possible end of the universe, the initial big explosion etc. There are various
inadequate explanations. Multi-Level model of the Universe is the only model which doesn't
have any problem with big-bang, expansion of the Universe, shrinking of the Universe, end
of (our level of) the Universe, black holes, quasars and other similar phenomena.
Multi-Level cosmological theory views our "Universe" simply as one level of a
multi-level universe, and for an external observer as one black hole in his (higher/outer)
level of the Universe. Whether we view it as a black-hole or as a Universe full of other
black holes depends on the position of the observer. For an observer in a higher (outer)
level of the Universe, our Universe appears as a black hole: infinitely small, infinitely
dense, into which keeps falling more and more matter, escaping from his (higher/outer)
level of the universe. And this black-hole, i.e. our level of the universe, had it's
beginning, in the viewpoint of the observer in the higher (outer) level of the universe,
when huge mass of matter became critically big and dense that it had created this black
hole, for example in centers of their galaxies.
For an internal observer, in our level of the universe, the point at which our level of
the universe had been created, i.e. at which our black-hole had been created, appears as
the big-bang. The collapse of the matter into our black hole and the creation of the event
horizon (as seen by the external observer), appears to us, the internal observers, as a
big bang, as a huge explosion, as a huge expansion.
Why? The beginning of the black hole, when light (and space, matter, energy and time =
SMET) loses it's ability to go back and interact in normal manner with the higher level is
a point at which this SMET inside the black hole creates it's own rules. Under these rules
the space, which is one of the aspects of SMET (space-matter-energy...) belonging to the
matter inside the black hole displays itself to the internal observer. Since, after the
creation of the event horizon, this huge amount of space trapped inside the black hole is
no longer the subject to the rules of the higher (outer) level of the universe, it
displays itself to the internal observer. And this display of space (one aspect of SMET)
to the internal observer appears as a space-explosion. So we should no longer define the
big-bang as an explosion of matter, but as an explosion of space.
In any level of the universe a big star contains not only a lot of matter and appears to
be heavy, but contains also a lot of space which is one of the aspects of matter (SMET)
and which cannot be separate and exist separately from matter. This concentration of space
inside a star can be measured as a space curvature. However when the star gets so big and
so dense that it becomes a black hole, the space trapped in this star now displays itself
to the internal observer (within that black hole), as a big-bang, i.e. as space explosion.
As more and more matter keeps falling into the black hole, for an observer inside that
black hole it appears that his level of the universe keeps expanding, because together
with the falling matter falls into the black hole also the appropriate amount of space,
which is an inseparable aspect of matter (SMET).
Singularity
The theoretically infinite density of matter in zero volume (zero space) is achieved when
the gravitational forces in a soon-to-be black-hole reach a critical mass. Upon reaching
of the critical mass, the superdense body in our level of the universe turns into a black
hole and in fact disappears from our level of the universe behind its event horizon. What
is observed as a disappearance in our level of the universe, from inside that newly born
black hole is observed as a big bang, as the beginning of a new level of the universe. So
singularity is being achieved in our level of the universe many times, and each time the
matter reaches singularity it disappears behind the event-horizon of a newly born
black-hole, i.e. a new, lower level of the universe. It appears likely that with
progression of time all the black-holes within our level of the universe will eventually
fuse together, i.e. fall into the largest black hole within our level. And it also appears
likely that this dominant black hole in our level of the universe, this
"mother-black-hole", will eventually swallow not only all the matter, all the
stars, galaxies and black holes in our level, but also our entire level of the universe.
Accelerating expansion of our level of the universe
Unlike flat, one-level cosmological models (big-bang, steady-state, pulsating...), the
apparent acceleration of the expansion of the universe is expected and can be easily
explained by the multi-level theory. According to the multi-level cosmological theory our
"universe" is simply one level of a multi-level universe. The acceleration of
the expansion of our level of the universe can be easily explained by the accelerating
amount of space-matter-energy-time (SMET) falling into our level from a higher (outer)
level of the universe. In fact this observable acceleration gives the multi-level
cosmological theory more credence than to one-level cosmologies. Multi-Level Cosmology
doesn't deny the big-bang, it only explains it in a different manner, from a viewpoint of
a multi-level universe.
Contrary to one-level cosmologies, which must invent special, unexplainable and mysterious
elements and forces to explain their inconsistencies, i.e. the "dark energy",
"dark matter" or the "cosmological constant", the multi-level
cosmology doesn't need any such "mysterious" energies and explanations.
According to the multi-level theory the accelerating expansion of our level of the
universe can be easily explained by the accelerating amount of space-matter-energy-time
(SMET) falling into our level of the universe from a higher level. In fact these
inconsistencies of the traditional one-level cosmologies give additional credibility to
the multi-level cosmology.
Pictures from CERN and LHC.
The dark energy and the cosmological constant.
The dark energy and the cosmological constant are not universally accepted. Some view them
as artificial constructs trying to explain away the failures and inconsistencies of the
the big bang and of other one-level cosmological theories. Multi-level universe theory
explains the accelerating expansion of the universe and other inconsistencies of the
traditional (one-level) theories differently. According to the multi-level theory the
accelerating expansion of our level of the universe is the result of the accelerating
amount of space-matter-energy-time (SMET) falling into our level from a higher level.
Ultimate fate of the Universe.
Unlike one-level models of the universe, the multi-level cosmology believes in the
existence of endless levels of the universe. In the multi-level model of the universe
higher levels of the universe keep falling into lower level of the universe and so on at
infinitum. New lower levels of the universe are being created within each level as new
black holes.
Mother-Black-Hole.
In the last few decades, using better and better telescopes, astronomers have been
increasingly looking at the edge of our observable universe seeking evidence of the
big-bang. According to the multi-level cosmology the big-bang wasn't as big as most think,
since most of the matter (SMET) in our level of the universe wasn't created by the
big-bang but was sucked in later on from the higher level of the universe. The
accelerating expansion of our level of the universe supports this theory and indicates
that our level of the universe is sucking in matter from the higher level at an increasing
rate. It might be more meaningful for the astronomers to look for the mother-black-hole,
i.e. the dominant black-hole in our level of the universe, which will eventually swallow
all the stars, galaxies, matter and lesser black-holes from our level of the universe, and
which will eventually swallow our entire level of the universe. As we can find smaller
black holes in the centers of the galaxies by the typical spiral pattern of the stars
around them, by looking for some kind of a pattern in the distribution of the galaxies it
might be possible to locate and identify the mother-black-hole.
One-Level Universe
One-Level cosmological models of the universe have been until recently the only accepted
models of the universe, just like in the middle ages flat-earth theory has been the only
acceptable theory. This One-Level view of the universe had been crushed by the Multi-Level
Cosmological model postulated by Mark Hucko in 1984. Perhaps the modern day inquisitors
will cry out to burn Mark Hucko at stake as their predecessors had burned Giordano Bruno
and others.
The One-Level cosmological model of the universe has many variants: big-bang, expanding,
steady-state, pulsating, oscillatory etc. Yet none one of these models can fully explain
all the natural phenomena not even the Big-Bang explosion which they view as the start of
the universe. For example the Big-Bang and similar theories describe the Big-Bang as a
huge explosion of matter at the beginning of the Universe. On the other hand the
Multi-Level theory explains it as a space-explosion, caused by the beginning of our level
of the universe which had begun as a black-hole in the higher level of the universe. So
the moment which the observers in the higher level of the universe observed as a collapse
of matter into a black hole and the creation of the event horizon, observers in our
(lower) level of the universe observed as a big-bang, as a space-explosion creating our
level of the universe.
Contrary to the pulsating model of the Universe, the Multi-Level model views the end of
our universe as a time when all the matter, all the black holes within our level of the
universe, collapse into one mother-black hole, which will in time swallow everything in
our level of the universe, including the entire level. But there is nothing to worry
about. The beginning of that mother black hole, which will eventually swallow the entire
level of our universe, was the beginning of a new level of the universe which had been
observed from inside of that black hole as a "big-bang". And so on.
To put it differently: the creation of the event-horizon appears from the higher level as
the disappearance of a huge amount of matter into a black hole, and at the same time
appears from a lower level (from within the black hole) as a huge space-explosion, usually
referred to as the big-bang. As more and more matter keeps falling into the lower level
(the black hole) it expands the lower level. The fact that our level of the universe is
measurably expanding simply means that there is more SMET falling into our level from a
higher level than we are losing to the black-holes within our level. The huge explosions
observed at the edge of the observable universe are simply stars, galaxies and black-holes
falling into our level from a higher level. As they cross the event-horizon, the space
trapped within is released and appears as space-explosions. That's the simple physics of
the "mysterious forces" within causing these "huge" explosions at the
edge of the observable universe..
Space disappearance
At the time of creation of a black hole within our level it appears that a large chunk of
space disappears from our level of the universe. The space curvatures around the
newly-born black hole change. Where has this space disappeared? In fact there is no real
disappearance of space there is only transition of the chunk of space from our level to a
lower level of the universe. This sudden transition of a chunk of space from our level to
a lower level of the universe, i.e. a newly born black hole (lower level) appears within
that black hole as a space-explosion, i.e. as a big bang, as a start of their level of the
universe. Without doubt this cataclysmic sudden disappearance of a large chunk of space
from our level into the black hole of the lower level of the universe, must demonstrate
itself in some ways to us, in our level of the universe. How does the birth of a new level
demonstrate itself to us: nova, supernova ... or?
Supernova SN-2006gy
The giant supernova SN-2006gy which was recorded in the first half of 2007 is a good
example of the creation of a new lower-level of the universe i.e. of a new black hole
within our level of the universe. The interaction between the two levels and the creation
of the new level of the universe are perceived from inside the newly created black hole as
a big-bang, while what we see in our level is a supernova explosion. There is no
mysterious new force which powers this explosion, the power behind it is simple gravity.
The collapse of a huge chunk of SMET into the black hole (lower level of the universe)
which is accompanied with the appropriate amount of disappeared space component of SMET,
suddenly changes the entire geometry of the affected region. The matter (SMET) which
didn't make it into the lower level, i.e. which didn't succeed in crossing the
event-horizon of the newly-born black hole is suddenly faced with another space-geometry
where a large chunk of SMET (and accompanying gravity) is missing. As a result of the
sudden reduction of gravity the SMET which remained on our side of the event-horizon
expands, i.e. "explodes". So the 'mysterious' and 'extraordinarily intriguing'
force (explosion mechanism) behind the supernova is a simple and sudden local reduction of
gravity due to the disappearance of large amount of SMET into the black hole.
Nova or Supernova?
Why the birth of a new black hole (i.e. of a new lower level of the universe) demonstrates
itself to us sometimes as nova and at other times as much more powerful supernova? The
size of the 'explosion' nova/supernova, depends on the initial type of the star which had
collapsed into a black hole. If the star is relatively small and dense, the type of a
white dwarf, then at the moment of the creation of the black hole a relatively high
percentage of the mass of the star crosses the event-horizon into the black hole, and
relatively little amount of matter (SMET) stays on our side of the event-horizon (in our
level). Thus the 'explosion' is relatively small. However in the case of a less dense star
converting (collapsing) into a black hole a relatively large amount of matter stays on our
side of the event horizon (in our level) and thus the 'explosion' appears to be much
larger since more matter-energy becomes dispersed into space as a result of the space
explosion caused by the change in the local space geometry due to the disappearance of
large amount of space-time (SMET) into the newly-born black hole.
Gradual big bang
Traditional one-level astronomers and cosmologists (also known as'flat' astronomers) view
the beginning of the universe (of our level) as starting with a big bang during which was
created all the matter (of our level) of the universe. According to multi-level cosmology
the most likely scenario is different. At first at the time of creation of our black hole,
i.e. of our level of the universe, there was a big bang, but it wasn't as big as some
think, since at that time our level of the universe was relatively small, containing the
space-matter-energy-time (SMET) of only one freshly born black-hole. However, this initial
big-bang was followed by a multitude of smaller bangs, as planets, stars, galaxies and
lesser black holes kept falling into our black hole, i.e. into our level of the universe,
from the higher level. Therefore: no single big bang, but a gradual big bang, in other
words many smaller big bangs continuing to this day. To this day we can observe this
additional SMET falling into our level of the universe as (probably) Quasars at the edge
of the observable universe, which keep expanding our (level of the) universe. Therefore,
the calculation of the age (of our level) of the universe on the basis of measuring the
distance of the most distant quasars could be very misleading. Because of the constant
expansion, due to the SMET falling into our level from a higher level, our level of the
universe could be different from the age calculated from the distance of such quasars
Hypothetical basic element.
What is the hypothetical basic element, the basic building block of the universe if it
exists? If we abbreviate Space-Matter-Energy-Time as SMET, perhaps the best name for the
hypothetical basic building stone of the universe would be "smeton". To help us
visualize the smeton, perhaps the best way would be as a minute bubble of space (or
vacuum), endlessly moving around with other smetons in their common (fused) bubble of
space, which is surrounded by non-space. Thus, for simplicity, gravity could be visualized
as some kind of a "vacuum", created by these bubbles of space in non-space,
which causes mutual attraction, in the same way as air-vacuum tends to suck in surrounding
objects.
Modern-Day Inquisition
As it was not possible for the people in the middle ages to imagine that the earth is not
flat, it is just as impossible for the modern day inquisitors in the cosmology to accept
the idea that our universe is just a black-hole in a multi-level universe, that it has
started as a big-star then as a black hole in the higher level of the universe and that it
will eventually fall into a lower level, which will be the biggest black hole in our level
of the universe, into which everything from our level will eventually fall. It is just
these limited minds of the inquisitors which have been suppressing the multi-level
cosmological model and who have been erasing it from the search engines and from the
Wikipedia. Just because the earth is flat - in their minds - it must remain flat also in
the minds of the rest of the world.
Can we travel between levels? - and other FAQ.
1) A practical question which comes to mind when investigating the multi-level universe is
whether or not we can travel between the various levels. Theoretically it should be
possible, especially from a higher level to a lower level. One thing we don't know yet:
what exactly happens at the event-horizon, i.e. the boundary between the higher and the
lower level of the Universe, or the boundary of the black hole. Normally when matter
crosses the event-horizon and falls into the black hole it explodes (as viewed from the
inside). We are not sure if we can figure out a way to prevent this explosion when we, as
beings, cross the event-horizon into a lower level of the universe.
2) Another question: how many levels are there? The Universe has probably many levels. At
this time we don't know how many, but most likely their number is finite.
3) What are all those very distant quasars and other huge explosions at the observable
edge of our level of the Universe? Probably stars, galaxies and even other black holes
continuously falling into our black hole, i.e. into our level of the universe. What we
observe as distant explosions are space explosions when the objects cross the event
horizon into our level (our black hole).
4) Which level is the biggest? Size of the "universes" (levels) is a relative
term. It is possible that our level of the universe is much bigger than the level above
us, in which our level is perceived only as a minute black-hole swallowing matter around
itself. By the same token the levels under our level, i.e. the black holes within our
level of the Universe, could be much bigger, that means they could contain much more
space-matter-energy-time, SMET, than our level. It is somewhat paradoxical: a bigger
object could be inside a much smaller object.
Copyright Notice: This is a scientific theory. In the interests of
science you are free to republish it, refer to it, discuss it, attack it, reject it... but
please make the usual link back to the source and reference to the author. Thank you.
Other information:
History of physical cosmology: Apart from the Big Bang and other
one-level cosmologies there is under study a radically different Multi-Level cosmology
postulated by Mark Hucko. Multi-Level cosmological model views our "universe" as
simply one-level of a multi level universe, as a black hole within the higher level of the
universe. According to Hucko the "big bang" is not a matter explosion but a
space explosion which coincides with the creation of the black hole (our level of the
universe) and of the event horizon in the higher level of the universe. Black holes within
our level of the universe are simply other, even lower levels of the universe.
Big Bang: Contrary to one-level cosmologies which must invent special,
unexplainable and mysterious forces and constants to explain their inconsistencies, the
multi-level cosmology doesn't need any such "mysterious" energies and doesn't
need to invent any constants to compensate for its deficiencies. According to the
multi-level theory the accelerating expansion of our level of the universe can be easily
explained by the accelerating amount of space-matter-energy-time (SMET) falling into our
level of the universe from a higher level. In fact these inconsistencies of the
traditional one-level cosmologies give additional credibility to the multi-level
cosmology. The multi-level theory had been postulated by Mark Hucko in 1984.
Big Bang: Some of the inconsistencies of the big-bang theory, such as the
accelerating expansion of our (level of the) universe can be easily explained by the
multi-level cosmological theory. According to the multi-level theory, postulated by Mark
Hucko, the accelerating expansion of our level of the universe can be explained by the
accelerating amount of matter falling into our level from a higher level.
Contrary to one-level cosmologies which must invent special, unexplainable and mysterious
forces and constants to explain their inconsistencies, the multi-level cosmology
doesn't need any such "mysterious" energies and doesn't need to invent any
constants to compensate for its deficiencies. For example, according to the multi-level theory
the accelerating expansion of our level of the universe can be easily explained by the
accelerating amount of space-matter-energy-time (SMET) falling into our level of the
universe from a higher level. In fact these inconsistencies of the traditional one-level
cosmologies give additional credibility to the multi-level cosmology.
The multi-level theory
had been postulated by Mark Hucko in 1984.
The dark energy and the cosmological constant are not universally accepted. Some view them
as artificial constructs trying to explain away the failures and inconsistencies of the
the big bang and of other one-level cosmological theories. Multi-level universe theory,
postulated in 1984 by Mark Hucko, explains the accelerating expansion of the universe and
other inconsistencies of the traditional theories differently. According to the
multi-level theory the accelerating expansion of our level of the universe is the result
of the accelerating amount of space-matter-energy-time (SMET) falling into our level from
a higher level.
Ultimate fate of the universe: Endless Levels. Multi-level cosmology
believes in the existence of endless levels of the universe. In the multi-level model of
the universe higher (outer) levels of the universe keep falling into lower (inner) levels
and so on at infinitum.
Dark Energy: Implications for the fate of the universe. The multi-level
cosmological theory has a different view of the ultimate fate of the universe. According
to the multi-level theory higher (outer) levels of the universe keep falling into lower
(inner) levels and so on at infinitum. Our level of the universe had started as a black
hole in a higher level of the universe, and the creation of that black hole and of the
event horizon coincides with the big-bang creation of our level of the universe. And each
black hole being born in our level of the universe is in fact a new level of the universe,
starting fresh with its own big bang. And so on at infinitum.
Dark matter: Yet another theory, the Multi-Level Theory, claims that dark
matter, dark energy and the cosmological constant are artificial constructs attempting to
explain away the inconsistencies and failures of Big Bang and of other one-level
cosmologies. According to the Multi-Level Theory the Big Bang occurred at the beginning of
our level of the universe but most matter in our level of the universe was not created by
the initial Big Bang but was sucked into our lever at a later time from the higher level,
and the accelerating expansion of our level of the universe could be explained by the
accelerated amount of matter (accompanied by space) falling into our level from the higher
level.
Big Crunch: Mutli-Level theory has somewhat different view of the Big
Crunch. According to the Multi-Level theory our level of the universe has started as a
black hole in the higher level and our entire level will be eventually gobbled up by the
largest black hole within our level of the universe.
================================================
Big Bang
Contrary to one-level cosmologies which must invent special, unexplainable and mysterious
forces to explain their inconsistencies, the [http://www.slovio.com/multi-level-universe/
multi-level cosmology] doesn't need any such "mysterious" energies. According to
the multi-level theory the accelerating expansion of our level of the universe can be
easily explained by the accelerating amount of space-matter-energy-time (SMET) falling
into our level of the universe from a higher level. In fact these inconsistencies of the
traditional one-level cosmologies give additional credibility to the
[http://www.slovio.com/multi-level-universe/ multi-level cosmology]. The multi-level
theory had been postulated by [[Mark Hucko]] in
1984.[http://www.slovio.com/multi-level-universe/]
Some of the inconsistencies of the big-bang theory, such as the
accelerating expansion of our (level of the) universe can be easily explained by the
[http://www.slovio.com/multi-level-universe/ multi-level cosmological theory]. According
to the [http://www.slovio.com/multi-level-universe/ multi-level theory], postulated by
[[Mark Hucko]], the accelerating expansion of our level of the universe can be explained
by the accelerating amount of matter falling into our level from a higher
level.[http://www.slovio.com/multi-level-universe/]
================================================
Ultimate fate of the universe
Endless levels
The multi-level
cosmological model postulates the existence of endless levels of the universe. While the
existence of our level of the universe is finite, there are endless levels of the universe
each one with its beginning and end, but the whole with an infinite existence.
===Endless Levels===
- [http://www.slovio.com/multi-level-universe/ Multi-level
cosmology] believes in the existence of endless levels of the universe. In the multi-level
model of the universe higher levels of the universe keep falling into lower levels and so
on at infinitum.
================================================
Mark HUCKO
brief biography
Mark Hucko was born on 15th September 1947 in Bratislava as the youngest of four children.
His Father, Jan Hucko, was a well-known Slovak sculptor, and his mother was a Czech
teacher.
As a
high-school student his favorite subjects were physics, math and three-dimensional
geometry. While he has had a good understanding of these exact sciences he felt that he
lacked the understanding of life sciences.
The death of his beloved godfather, the sadness of death around him as well as his
knowledge-gap in biology and in understanding of the biological world around him had
inspired Mark Hucko to study life-sciences, with emphasis on Biology and Genetics at the
University of Toronto, Canada, where he had emigrated in 1968.
Further inspiration came from a science-fiction story in which the future humans have not
been limited by aging, by death, but could chose to live the lives they wanted - for as
long as they wanted.
The contrast between the immortal future in science fiction and the sad facts of death
around him had inspired Mark Hucko in the 1970ies to coin the term "Immortology" and to start
immortology research. He had believed that the achievement of human physical immortality
was only a question of time and of adequate and channeled scientific effort. At first his
idea that "death and taxes" were avoidable had brought him ridicule. Only after
the start of the life-extension movement in the United States in the late seventies, could
he find other people with similar opinions.
His somewhat turbulent personal life has brought him from Canada and the
United States into Switzerland where he had lived from 1983 to 1987. During this period he
had done intensive scientific research. There he had fformulated his cosmological
theories, and continued with writing. At that time he had also written
"Blitz-English" a simplified, easy-to learn form of the English language.
In late 1987 Mark Hucko returned to eastern Canada where he had stayed until 1993. Then he
had once more moved to Switzerland to live with wife and children, and to run a computer
business.
The facts of Swiss-German racism and the brutal oppression of Ethnic minorities in
Switzerland had inspired Mark Hucko to get engaged in the Human-Rights movement, and
became engaged in the Ombudsman International organization.
The Swiss-German ethnic
oppression and disdain for other cultures and languages had also inspired Mark Hucko to
create Slovio, a simplified universal Slavic language.
There were many attempts to classify Mark Hucko, who he is or isn't. As a member of Mensa it is
clear that Mark Hucko is a man of extraordinary intelligence. His background and interests
in a wide-range of sciences and in linguistics make it difficult to put him into one
single category. Perhaps the time will show in which of the many fields of interest has he
made the biggest contribution.
2011 Nobel Peace Prize in Physics: "for the discovery of the
accelerating expansion of the Universe through observations of distant supernovae"
The The Nobel Prize in Physics 2011 was awarded to Saul Perlmutter, Brian P. Schmidt, Adam
G. Riess, who have confirmed the accelerating expansion of the Universe predicted by the
Multi-Level Cosmology.
God Particle or Higgs Boson or "Gravity-Particle" found!
On September 10, 2008 was started in CERN institute the LHC, i.e. the Large Hadron
Collider which is supposed to simulate situation which existed just after the 'Big Bang'.
Many scientists hope it will find the theoretical but yet undiscovered 'Higgs boson' also
known as the 'God Particle'. The problem is that these scientists think of the Universe in
Euclidian-geometry terms, and don't realize that the 'God Particle' is in reality space
curvature. It is here, one does not have to look for it because it does not exist as a
'particle' but it is the space curvature of the non-Euclidian geometry which causes
gravity. The Multi-Level Cosmology explains it further.
Peter Higgs came up with his theory which predict the existence of this
"gravity-particle" around 1964. On the other hand, Stephen Hawkins rejects the
existence of the "gravity particle". Only extensive experiments with the LHC can
decide who is closer to the truth. Without insulting or belittling the contribution of
both of these Physicists, read further and consider the Multi-Level Cosmology, which not
only explains the existence of the macro-universe but also explains the sub-atomic
universe.
As a
high-school student his favorite subjects were physics, math and three-dimensional
geometry. While he has had a good understanding of these exact sciences he felt that he
lacked the understanding of life sciences.
His somewhat turbulent personal life has brought him from Canada and the
United States into Switzerland where he had lived from 1983 to 1987. During this period he
had done intensive scientific research. There he had f
